Employee Choir. All community members seeking a way to commemorate the Dr. The compilated presentation of speakers and music will air on the Durham Television Network on January Over the years, program attendance has expanded to include residents of Durham and neighboring communities.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser for a better user experience. Skip to Main Content. Home I Want To Jump to subpage Public Information Specialist, Durham County The lesson culminates with a comparison to other leaders who have been consistently nonviolent in spite of great personal risk.
Published on January 4, Celebrate the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. Observing Martin Luther King, Jr. Civil Rights Leader In this lesson, students will watch a video about Dr. It takes the form of sit-in demonstrations by Negro students against segregation in public eating places. It is part of a broader campaign of nonviolent resistance led by the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
King is a Baptist minister and head of the Southern Christian Leadership Congress, Conference rather, which is spearheading the passive resistance movement. King first attracted nationwide attention in when he led the boycott against segregation in public buses in Montgomery, Alabama.
His activities have resulted five times in his arrest, and his home and his church were bombed. Early this year, Dr. King moved his base of operations from Montgomery to Alabama, to Atlanta, Georgia. He is thirty-one-years old. He was born in the South, educated for the ministry in the North.
And now seated around the press table ready to interview Dr. Private business has its own rights and can do what it wants. First, I should say that this was an unfortunate statement, and we were very disappointed to hear the president, the former president of the United States, make such a statement. Truman disagreed with the sit-ins he should certainly disagree with them on a higher level. Following his past record, it seems to me that Mr.
How successful do you think you have been, or are being, in winning the friendship and understanding of the white men of the South? The nonviolent way does not bring about miracles, in a few hours, or in a few days, or in a few years, for that matter. I think at first, the first reaction of the oppressor, when oppressed people rise up against the system of injustice, is an attitude of bitterness.
But I do believe that if the nonviolent resisters continue to follow the way of nonviolence they eventually get over to the hearts and souls of the former oppressors, and I think it eventually brings about that redemption that we dream of.
King, you speak of your movement as a nonviolent movement, and yet the end product of it has been violence. First, the end result has not been a violent result. I would say that there has been some violence here and there, but the nonviolent resister does not go on with the idea that there will not be any violence inflicted upon him. In other words, he is always willing to be the recipient of violence but never to inflict it upon another. He goes on the idea that he must act now against injustice with moral means, and he feels that in acting against this injustice that he must never inflict injury upon the opponent.
But he is always prepared to absorb the violence which emerges, if such violence emerges in the process. And is this a good method of procedure? This has been affirmed by the Supreme Court of the nation, mainly in the decision outlawing segregation in the public schools. It made it palpably clear that separate facilities are inherently unequal. So that in breaking local laws we are really seeking to dignify the law and to affirm the real and positive meaning of the law of the land.
King, in connection with the sit-in movement and other aspects of the racial question, there has certainly been an increase in tension in various parts of the South, what Mr. Spivak was speaking of, regardless of the motivation.
During the last week, the New York Times has run some stories about Birmingham, Alabama, suggesting that a kind of reign of terror is taking place there with the officials on the side of those terrorizing those who believe in racial equality. Do you think the federal government has a place to play in, say, Birmingham, or in connection with your sit-in demonstrations? I think the federal government has the responsibility of protecting our citizens of this nation as they protest against unjust, the injustices which they face.
I also feel that the executive branch of the government should do more in terms of moral persuasion. The legislative branch should certainly do more in giving the proper legislation, so that the transition will be made in a much smoother manner than we are facing now. You speak of the legislative branch. I wonder what you think of that and what more you would have had Congress do.
And by omitting this section of the bill, I think we face something very disappointing.
0コメント